Analytics

Problem: Behaviour reports don't differentiate between who reported and who issued/assigned the behaviour; UI lacks controls to work with this data. Solution: Add fields and visual controls (sliders/filters) to show and slice by 'reported by' and 'issued by/assigned to' across reports and MIS views. Benefit: Clearer accountability and more actionable insights for staff and leadership.

School are using a new SEND Provision code - Monitoring (M) to reprsent pupils with No (N) SEND provision, when currently waiting review for a specific need. Can we add the data to the SEND report section? Currently, pupils appear with No specific provision, and with related needs

Report request to provide comparison data

Problem: Trust-level overview lacks GDS. Solution: Add GDS metric to Trust Overview tiles and charts. Benefit: Enables trust-wide benchmarking at greater depth.

Problem: Trend reports are missing GDS (Greater Depth Standard). Solution: Add GDS to trend visualizations and summaries. Benefit: Completeness of assessment reporting.

Problem: 'Whole Class' label is inaccurate; represents the entire selected group which may be school-wide or a subset (e.g., PP). Solution: Change label to 'All pupils' (or 'Selected group') wherever the grouping applies. Benefit: Clearer terminology and reduced confusion.

Problem: This report lacks an easily accessible year group filter though adjacent reports have it. Solution: Add a standard Year Group filter to the view toolbar. Benefit: Consistency and faster slicing by cohort.

Problem: Over-time/Grid views show numeric aggregates that don't map to grades when all subjects are selected. Solution: Display subject-specific grades where applicable; leave blank or show where aggregation is non-meaningful. Benefit: Prevents misinterpretation by teachers.

Problem: Pupil-level analysis is useful but poorly represented; overlapping group membership is hard to understand. Solution: Provide Venn diagram visualizations to show overlaps between selected groups/attributes. Benefit: Clearer insights into multi-factor pupil group intersections.

Problem: Y4 MTC lacks a key measure, the number/percentage of pupils attaining full marks. Solution: Add tiles/metrics for count and % of full marks. Benefit: Enables quick benchmarking of MTC performance.